Comments on: Rendered redundant http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rendered-redundant from Live Journal to here... Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:22:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tariquesani http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2307 tariquesani Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:06:49 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2307 <p><q>Nice! Congratulations and best of luck.</q></p> <p>Thanks</p> Nice! Congratulations and best of luck.

Thanks

]]> By: vaibhav http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2306 vaibhav Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:48:45 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2306 <p>Nice! Congratulations and best of luck.</p> <p>Being made redundant is the only way to move/scale "up". I too am feeling the pressure now and am well on my way to find myself a replacement at work.</p> Nice! Congratulations and best of luck.

Being made redundant is the only way to move/scale “up”. I too am feeling the pressure now and am well on my way to find myself a replacement at work.

]]> By: tariquesani http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2303 tariquesani Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:59:09 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2303 <p><q>but bad for single points</q><br /> agreed.</p> but bad for single points
agreed.

]]> By: bluesmoon http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2302 bluesmoon Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:53:35 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2302 <p>good for multipoints (I use it for my <a href="http://bluesviews.blogspot.com/2004/01/california-index.html">city index</a>), but bad for single points like the location of your house.</p> good for multipoints (I use it for my city index), but bad for single points like the location of your house.

]]> By: tariquesani http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2301 tariquesani Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:42:12 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2301 <p>Ah!! differing needs - I use gmap for bird distribution and zoom 4 is just right for it</p> Ah!! differing needs – I use gmap for bird distribution and zoom 4 is just right for it

]]> By: bluesmoon http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2300 bluesmoon Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:38:15 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2300 <p>zoom level 4 isn't very useful. I'd look for a maximum of 2 for things like this. My restaurant reviews need zoom level 0.</p> zoom level 4 isn’t very useful. I’d look for a maximum of 2 for things like this. My restaurant reviews need zoom level 0.

]]> By: tariquesani http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2299 tariquesani Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:34:35 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2299 <p>FWIW - in all my experiments zoom level 4 works for pretty much anywhere in the world even via API - try the distribution map link on this website http://nagpurbirds.org/thumbnails.php?album=5</p> FWIW – in all my experiments zoom level 4 works for pretty much anywhere in the world even via API – try the distribution map link on this website http://nagpurbirds.org/thumbnails.php?album=5

]]> By: bluesmoon http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2298 bluesmoon Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:21:21 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2298 <p>Yeah, on the gmaps website. It doesn't work via the API.</p> Yeah, on the gmaps website. It doesn’t work via the API.

]]> By: brainz http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2297 brainz Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:58:12 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2297 <p>The water body is outside their plot area dude. Even if they believe in FengShui/Vastu, its only applicable inside the periphery of plot. </p> The water body is outside their plot area dude. Even if they believe in FengShui/Vastu, its only applicable inside the periphery of plot.

]]> By: tariquesani http://tariquesani.net/blog/2006/02/20/rendered-redundant/#comment-2296 tariquesani Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:45:30 +0000 http://tarique.sanisoft.com/lj/?p=581#comment-2296 <p><q>because gmaps and ymaps are not global yet</q><br /> ymaps yes, but for gmap use the Sat images or Hybrid images and you pretty much have the globe covered</p> because gmaps and ymaps are not global yet
ymaps yes, but for gmap use the Sat images or Hybrid images and you pretty much have the globe covered

]]>